Search
Search for a symbol or emoji...
Body Surface Area Calculator
The following are body surface area results based on common formulas:
| Formula | Results in different units |
|---|---|
| Du Bois | 1.85 m²  19.89 ft²  2,865 in² |
| Mosteller | 1.84 m²  19.86 ft²  2,859 in² |
| Haycock | 1.85 m²  19.88 ft²  2,863 in² |
| Gehan & George | 1.85 m²  19.95 ft²  2,873 in² |
| Boyd | 1.85 m²  19.92 ft²  2,869 in² |
| Fujimoto | 1.80 m²  19.36 ft²  2,788 in² |
| Takahira | 1.86 m²  20.05 ft²  2,887 in² |
| Schlich | 1.76 m²  18.95 ft²  2,728 in² |
The Body Mass Index (BMI) for the given weight and height is 22.9 kg/m².
Educational estimate only. BSA is a model output and should be interpreted with clinical context when used medically.
BSA formulas may diverge at body-size extremes. Clinical dosing decisions should follow professional protocols.
Body Surface Area Calculator: BSA Formulas, Unit Conversion, and BMI Context
How to use
- Choose metric or US units.
- Enter body weight and height carefully.
- Compare formula outputs in the result table.
- Use the formula required by your local workflow when needed.
- Treat BMI as context and BSA as estimate, not a diagnosis.
Formula and method
BSA is computed from weight (kg) and height (cm) using multiple equations: Du Bois, Mosteller, Haycock, Gehan & George, Boyd, Fujimoto, Takahira, and Schlich (sex-specific). Outputs are converted to m2, ft2, and in2.
Complete Guide
What a body surface area calculator does
A body surface area calculator estimates total body surface area (BSA) from body weight and height. Because direct body surface measurement is impractical in most settings, equations are used to approximate area in square meters. BSA is widely used in clinical workflows, especially where body-size normalization improves comparability between patients.
This calculator displays multiple formulas side by side instead of forcing one method. That helps users see how equation choice can shift outputs. It also shows converted values in m2, ft2, and in2 so the results are usable across clinical references, educational materials, and regional documentation practices.
BSA tools are commonly used in medication planning contexts, cardiovascular indexing, and renal or oncology references. Still, this calculator is educational and does not replace protocol-driven dosing or clinician judgment.
Why multiple formulas are shown
Different BSA formulas were developed from different cohorts and assumptions. Some place stronger weight emphasis, others balance height and weight differently, and some include transformations that behave differently at body-size extremes. For this reason, two formulas can produce close values in one profile but diverge in another.
Displaying Du Bois, Mosteller, Haycock, Gehan & George, Boyd, Fujimoto, Takahira, and Schlich allows comparison literacy. Instead of asking which formula is universally best, users can understand spread and context. In many routine cases, differences are small; near extremes, spread can become clinically relevant.
A practical rule is to follow local institutional protocol when BSA is used for dosing or formal reporting. Comparison output is still useful for quality checks and cross-reference discussions.
How BSA and BMI differ
BSA and BMI answer different questions. BSA estimates body surface area and is often used to scale physiological or dosing variables. BMI estimates weight relative to height and is used as a broad screening metric for weight-status context. One is not a replacement for the other.
This calculator shows BMI as a supporting line because many users interpret BSA alongside general anthropometric context. A normal BMI does not imply one exact BSA, and similar BSA can occur across different body compositions. Always interpret each metric for its intended purpose.
When making health decisions, combine metrics with laboratory data, clinical history, and provider guidance instead of relying on a single anthropometric index.
Unit handling and conversion reliability
Inputs can be entered in metric or US units, then normalized internally. Metric mode accepts kg and cm directly. US mode uses pounds plus feet/inches and converts to metric for formula computation. Output is then displayed in m2, ft2, and in2 for readability.
Unit mistakes are a common source of bad calculator output. If results look implausible, verify entry units first. For example, entering pounds as kilograms can dramatically inflate BSA estimates.
Use one consistent system per calculation session, and recheck height formatting in US mode when feet and inches are entered separately.
Clinical context and safe interpretation
In clinical practice, BSA may support standardized comparisons, but protocol details still matter. Medication dosing often includes guardrails beyond BSA, such as organ function, toxicity thresholds, and treatment intent. Therefore, BSA should be seen as one input within a broader decision system.
At very low or very high body sizes, formula divergence and physiologic variability can increase uncertainty. This is one reason protocol-based care and clinician oversight remain essential when BSA affects treatment decisions.
Use this calculator for education, planning discussions, and cross-checking. Do not use it as a standalone treatment tool.
How to use this calculator in practice
Step 1: choose unit system and enter height/weight carefully. Step 2: review the formula table and note spread across equations. Step 3: if one specific formula is required by your workflow, prioritize that row. Step 4: use BMI line as supporting context only. Step 5: when medical action depends on BSA, confirm with professional protocol.
For routine tracking, stay consistent with one formula to reduce noise over time. Switching formulas between visits can mimic false change.
If the table shows unusually wide spread, double-check entries and ensure measurements are current. Then discuss the most appropriate equation for your setting.
Practical notes
Protocol alignment
When BSA is used in care pathways, follow the formula specified by the relevant protocol.
Consistency rule
Track with one formula across timepoints to avoid artificial trend shifts.
Data quality
Accurate height and weight inputs matter more than equation complexity in many routine scenarios.
Limitations
- BSA is an estimate, not direct measurement.
- Formula outputs may differ, especially at body-size extremes.
- Not a substitute for clinician-guided dosing decisions.
- BMI line is contextual and not a full health diagnosis.
FAQ
Which BSA formula should I use?
Use the formula required by your institution or workflow. Mosteller is often used for quick estimation, but protocol requirements vary.
Why are my formula results not identical?
Each formula uses different coefficients and assumptions, so small differences are expected.
Is BSA better than BMI?
They serve different purposes; BSA is for surface-area scaling, BMI is for weight-status screening context.
Can I use this for medication dosing by myself?
No. Medication dosing should follow professional protocols and clinician supervision.